We here revisit their approach in a simplified, propositional logic, for which we give a complete axiomatization.
Within that logic we study the definition of achievement goals, refining C&L's analysis. Our analysis allows us to identify the conditions under which achievement goals persist. We then discuss the C&L definition of intention as well as a variant that has been proposed by Sadek and Bretier. We argue that both are too strong and propose a weakened version.
@InProceedings{, author = {Herzig, Andreas and Longin, Dominique}, title = {C&L intention revisited}, year = {2004}, pages = {}, publisher = {}, booktitle = {Proc. KR2004}, month = {2-5 june}, }