LILaC
- paper abstract
On iterated revision in the AGM framework
Herzig, Andreas and Konieczny, Sébastien and Perrussel, Laurent
Abstract:
While AGM belief revision identifies belief states with sets of formulas,
proposals for iterated revision are usually based on more complex belief states.
In this paper we investigate within the AGM framework several postulates
embodying some aspects of iterated revision.
Our main results are negative:
when added to the AGM postulates, our postulates force revision to be maxichoice
(whenever the new piece of information is inconsistent with the current beliefs
the resulting belief set is maximal).
We also compare our results to revision operators with memory and
we investigate some postulates proposed in this framework.
PostScript
PostScript, gzipped
Bibtex-entry:
@InProceedings{ HeKoPe-Ecsqaru03,
author = {Herzig, Andreas and Konieczny, Sébastien and Perrussel, Laurent},
title = {On iterated revision in the AGM framework },
year = {2003},
pages = {218-230},
publisher = {Springer Verlag, LNAI 2711 },
booktitle = {Seventh European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches
to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU-2003) , Aalborg, Denmark},
month = {2 juillet-5 juillet},
}
https://www.irit.fr/~Andreas.Herzig