Applying the AMAS adequacy at the local level for the ETTO problem gives the following result:
 
  Adequacy at the local level

The answers that have been given to the different questions can be justified by what is following:
 
9. The system's components have only a limited rationality 10
For the time being, components have not been defined yet and depend on the vision of the engineer (see the question #6). It is then too early to determine what these components know about the environment.
10. At first sight, coarse-grain components must be used 17
The components which are taking charge of the time-tabling problem solving must be, a priori, able to bring the same expertise as a human being trying to solve it by hand. We can then say that the components are coarse_grain ones.
11. Components' behaviour can evolve 0
For the ETTO problem such as it has been specified, the system components don't need to adapt to a fundamentally different environment or to new kinds of stakeholders, their behaviours should be then stay more or less the same.


 

The result of the graphical tool can be expressed with these words:
 

Some components of the system are justifying development with AMAS. ADELFE has to be applied on those components.