Applying the AMAS adequacy at the local level for the ETTO problem gives the following result:
The answers that have been given to the different questions can be justified by what is following:
9. The system's components have only a limited rationality | 10 |
For the time being, components have not been defined yet and depend on the vision of the engineer (see the question #6). It is then too early to determine what these components know about the environment. | |
10. At first sight, coarse-grain components must be used | 17 |
The components which are taking charge of the time-tabling problem solving must be, a priori, able to bring the same expertise as a human being trying to solve it by hand. We can then say that the components are coarse_grain ones. | |
11. Components' behaviour can evolve | 0 |
For the ETTO problem such as it has been specified, the system components don't need to adapt to a fundamentally different environment or to new kinds of stakeholders, their behaviours should be then stay more or less the same. |
The result of the graphical tool can be expressed with these words:
Some components of the system are justifying development with AMAS. ADELFE has to be applied on those components.