Self-Organisation in MAS - TFG AgentLink III


 

New:
  • Seventh meeting in Paris - In conjonction with EUMAS'10, 15th of December. See the main web site of the 7th Agent Technical Fora.
    The preliminary agenda is available.

  • Sixth meeting in Bath - In conjonction with EUMAS'08, 17th of December. See the programme here (pdf).
     
  • Fifth meeting in Hammamet -
    See this page for more information on this event.
    The program is downloadable here
      Documents are downloadable from the "Meeting" page.
     
  • Report of the fourth meeting in Lisbon.

  • Fourth meeting at EUMAS'06 in Lisbon -
    • Some pictures took in Lisbon
    Agenda under the "Meeting" page.
     
  • List of papers of the group under the people page.

    •  
  • Third meeting in Budapest -
    • Participant list and short report available.
  • Slides of the tutorial made at CEEMAS'05 by G. Di Marzo Serugendo, M-P. Gleizes and A. Karageorgos are available (zipped pdf, 3.8 Mo). See also this web site.
  • Third meeting in Budapest -
    Some pictures are available thanks to Luca Gardelli, see the private area.
    The final program, and a first presentation, are available.
    The proposal has been accepted to participate to the third AL3 Technical Forum in Budapest in September.
  • Second meeting in Ljubljana -
    A second formal meeting has taken place in Ljubljana, Slovenia, on March 1st and 2nd, 2005.
    A long report and a short one (pdf) are available, see also the "Meeting" page for more information and documents/slides.
  • A third case study is available here or in the private area. Please, contact the TFG chairs to get the login and password to access this area.
  • A dinner meeting occurred on Tuesday July 20th after the ESOA 2004 workshop in New York.
  • First meeting in Rome -
    See also the "Meeting page" to get more information about the first meeting in Rome (from 30 June to 2 July 2004).

 
Last update: 10/12/2010
 

 

Scope

The scope of this TFG is to work on self-organisation in the complex distributed systems such as MAS. In order to have a broader view, the multi-agent systems studied must be different in terms of granularity, cardinality and heterogeneity of their agents. The point of focus of the proposed TFG will be on approaches to incorporate self-organisation mechanisms in the design of Multi-agent Systems. In particular, the efforts will concentrate on attempting to answer questions of major interest such as:

  • How could self-organisation mechanisms already applied in other disciplines be reused in the design of MAS?
  • How could we derive appropriate self-organisation mechanisms for MAS starting from a set of application requirements?
  • Can a set of criteria suitable for characterisation of self-organisation and emergence in MAS be defined?
  • Is it possible to define a number of benchmark applications that could be used for comparison of different self-organisation engineering approaches given the above criteria? Benchmarks are well-defined applications which can be used by researchers to show, to evaluate and to compare their techniques of self-organisation.
  • How to strengthen the links with other disciplines such as biology, systemics, sociology and physics? Due to the diversity of the issues involved with self-organisation, participation of people from different disciplines such as biology, systemics, sociology, physics and software engineering will be strongly encouraged so that the problem of self-organisation will be highlighted from different perspectives.

Aims

The TFG will concern itself with five main aims:

  • Grouping together the computing science research community working on self-organization and emergent behavior such as multi-agent systems, autonomic computing, pervasive computing
  • Establishing and enhancing links with other disciplines through contacts with networks such as EXYSTENCE, or researcher community involved in the new EU NEST-PATHFINDER initiative (Tackling Complexity of Science).
  • Providing a common definition of several notions with an interdisciplinary view such as: self-organization, emergence, complexity, adaptive systems, providing their commonalities and their differences, as well as the theories behind each of them.
  • Defining at least one benchmark to enable researchers to compare their results.
  • Proposing a set of necessary measures to evaluate a self-organizing mechanism.

 

 
Home page
Last update: 10/12/2010
Problems or remarks about this web pages : Remarks